Wednesday, 30 November 2016

Principles of Organizations

PRINCIPLES OF ORGANIZATION

Principle of unity of objectives

Organizational goals, departmental goals, and individual goals must be clearly defined. All goals and objectives must have uniformity. When there is contradiction among different level of goals desired goals can’t be achieved. Therefore, unity of objectives is necessary

Principle of specialization

Sound and effective organization believes on organization. The term specialization is related to work and employees. When an employee takes special type of knowledge and skill in any area, it is known as specialization. Modern business organization needs the specialization, skill and knowledge by this desired sector of economy and thus, efficiency would be established.

Principle of coordination

In an organization many equipment, tools are used. Coordination can be obtained by group effort that emphasize on unity of action. Therefore, coordination facilitates in several management concepts
Organization is a means of creating co-ordination among different departments of the enterprise. It creates clear cut relationships among positions and ensure mutual co-operation among individuals. Harmony of work is brought by higher level managers exercising their authority over interconnected activities of lower level administrator.
For smooth running of an organization, the co-ordination between authority- responsibility is very important. There should be co-ordination between different relationships. Clarity should be made for having an ultimate responsibility attached to every authority. There is a saying, “Authority without responsibility leads to ineffective behavior and responsibility without authority makes person ineffective.” Therefore, co-ordination of authority- responsibility is very important.

Principle of authority

Authority is the kind of right and power through which it guides and directs the actions of others so that the organizational goals can be achieved. It is also related with decision making. It is vested in particular position, not to the person because authority is given by an institution and therefore it is legal. It generally flows from higher level to lowest level of organization. There should be unbroken line of authority.

Principle of responsibility

Authentic body of an organization is top level management, top level management direct the subordinates. Departmental administrators and other personnel take the direction from top level management to perform the task. Authority is necessary to perform the work .only authority is not provided to the people but obligation is also provided. So the obligation to perform the duties and task is known as responsibility. Responsibility can’t be delegated. It can’t be avoided.

Principle of delegation

Process of transferring authority and creation of responsibility between superior and subordinates to accomplish a certain task is called delegation of authority. Authority is only delegated, not responsibilities in all levels of management. The authority delegated should be equal to responsibility

Principle of efficiency

In enterprise different resources are used. Therese resources must be used in effective manner. When the organization fulfill the objectives with minimum cost, it is effective. Organization must always concentrate on efficiency.

Principle of unity of command

Subordinates should receive orders from single superior at a time and all subordinates should be accountable to that superior. More superior leads to confusion, delay and so on. It implies one subordinate-one superior relationship. Every subordinate is answerable and accountable to one boss at one time. This helps in avoiding communication gaps and feedback and response is prompt. Unity of command also helps in effective combination of resources, that is, physical, financial resources which helps in easy co-ordination and, therefore, effective organization.

Authority Flows from Top to Bottom

Inspector General of Police (I.G.P)
Deputy Inspector General of Police (D.I.G)
District Police Officer (D.P.O)
Inspectors of Police

Principle of span of control

Unlimited subordinates can’t be supervised by an administrator, this principle thus helps to determine numerical limit if subordinates to be supervised by an administrator. This improves efficiency. According to this principle, span of control is a span of supervision which depicts the number of employees that can be handled and controlled effectively by a single administrator. According to this principle, an administrator should be able to handle what number of employees under him should be decided. This decision can be taken by choosing either from a wide or narrow span. There are two types of span of control:-
  1. Wide span of control- It is one in which a manager can supervise and control effectively a large group of persons at one time. The features of this span are:-
    • Less overhead cost of supervision
    • Prompt response from the employees
    • Better communication
    • Better supervision
    • Better co-ordination
    • Suitable for repetitive jobs
According to this span, one administrator can effectively and efficiently handle a large number of subordinates at one time.
  1. Narrow span of control- According to this span, the work and authority is divided amongst many subordinates and an administrator doesn't supervises and control a very big group of people under him. The administrator according to a narrow span supervises a selected number of employees at one time. The features are:-
    • Work which requires tight control and supervision, for example, handicrafts etc.
    • Co-ordination is difficult to be achieved.
    • Communication gaps can come.
    • Messages can be distorted.
    • Specialization work can be achieved.

Principle of balance

The functional activities their establishment and other performances should be balanced properly. Authority, centralization, decentralization must be balance equally. This is very challenging job but efficient management must keep it.

Principle of communication

Communication is the process of transformation of information from one person to another of different levels. It involves the systematic and continuous process of telling, listening and understanding opinions ideas, feelings, information, views etc, in flow of information. Effective communication is important

Principle of personal ability

For sound organization, human resources is important. Employees must be capable. Able employees can perform higher. Mainly training and development programs must be encouraged to develop the skill in the employees

Principle of flexibility

Organizational structure must be flexible considering the environmental dynamism. Sometimes, dramatically change may occur in the organization and in that condition, organization should be ready to accept the change

Principle of simplicity

This principles emphasizes the simplicity of organizational structure, the structure if organization should be simple with minimum number of levels do that its member an understand duties and authorities.

Print Friendly and PDF

Tuesday, 29 November 2016

ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL INSTABILITY IN AFGHANISTAN

ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL INSTABILITY IN AFGHANISTAN 

Understanding Afghanistan’s History and Politics

Many of the historical events in Afghanistan went largely ignored by the Western World until those events directly threatened the security of the West, the US in particular. As a nation in Central Asia, Afghanistan has been influenced by the surrounding nations, as well as by the major world powers which have fought for domination of Asia throughout the past two centuries. Unfortunately, the security and stability of Afghanistan have been compromised by such battles, and the country has often been at the mercy of larger world powers, including Great Britain, the Soviet Union, and the United States.

Consolidation of Afghanistan (1747) – Pashtun Tribes

Emergence of Afghanistan as a nation; Pashtun tribes developed an alliance under Ahmed Khan Abdali (Ahmad Shah Durani). Before this date, the area known as Afghanistan today consisted of tribes dominated by various empires throughout history.

Anglo-Afghan Wars (British Intervention and Invasion)

1839-1842 – Britain set up a puppet government in Afghanistan to prevent Russian influence from spreading; Afghans protested and revolted; thousands of British and Indian troops were killed, leading to British withdrawal.
1878 – British troops returned to major cities in Afghanistan due to fears of Russian influence and power.
1893 – The British drew the Durand Line, a border between Afghanistan and British India. This border split the Pashtun population between Afghanistan and present-day Pakistan; Afghanistan became a buffer state between British India and the Russian Empire.

Reign of King Zahir Shah (1933-1973)

King Zahir Shah was finally able to rid Afghanistan of British influence and began modernizing many aspects of Afghanistan, including government (democratic reforms), education (establishment of universities), and women’s rights.

Reign of Daoud Khan (1973-1978) – People’s Democratic Party of Afghanistan (PDPA)

Daoud Khan took over in a bloodless coup while the king was in Italy. He ended the monarchy and established a republic. However, with democratic reforms came opposition, including from intellectuals and a communist party. In 1970-71, the government was ineffective in responding to a drought, increasing domestic discontent with Daoud. Increasingly, Daoud Khan denied parties like the PDPA any participation in the government. In 1978, Daoud Khan was assassinated in a coup by the PDPA.

Soviet Invasion (1979) – Soviet Union, PDPA, Afghan Resistance

Once the PDPA, which was communist, established itself as the government of Afghanistan, the Soviets began supplying the new Communist government with advisors and, military equipment. When resistance to the new government broke out, the Soviets installed a puppet government and eventually completed a full-scale military invasion. The Soviets needed a sympathetic government in Afghanistan for several reasons.
First, it needed Afghanistan as a buffer state for its many central Asian enemies: Iran, Pakistan and China. Iran was ardently anti-communist but also anti-American., so the Soviets were concerned the United States might use Afghanistan as a place for battle against Iran. Iran’s revolution had just established the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the Soviets did not want to be bordered by Muslim-majority states. The US was allied with Pakistan and therefore had direct influence on Afghanistan. Finally, the Soviet Union had spread its empire to Central Asia, but the Afghanistan could have provided the next stepping stone to the Indian Ocean. All of these factors contributed to Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.

Soviet Occupation and Afghan Resistance (1979-1989) – Soviet Union and the Muhajedin

After the Soviet invasion, the number of refugees in Pakistan swelled to 400,000 by 1980. Those numbers would reach over 4 million by the end of the occupation. Peshawar was a base for the opposition parties and tribal groups to organize the resistance against the Soviets. The resistance fighters, known as the muhajedin, united around a nationalist ideology and resistance to foreign domination. The muhajedin received funding and weapons from the US CIA through Pakistan, as well as from Iran, Saudi Arabia, and China. The war completely destroyed many villages and towns in Afghanistan, as well as irrigation systems that were hundreds of years old. As a result, the infrastructure, economy, and political system of Afghanistan were left in shambles by the time the muhajedin were able to force the Soviets to withdraw in 1989.

The Taliban

The power vacuum allowed the Taliban, a militant student movement that grew out of hardline religious schools in Pakistan, to take the southern city of Kandahar in 1994 and Kabul in 1996.
The regime, which adhered to a strict interpretation of Islam.
Bin Laden and al Qaeda relocated to Afghanistan in the mid-1990s after being forced to leave Sudan. They based themselves around Kandahar. The Taliban provoked international condemnation, particularly over their treatment of women. Only three countries - Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates - recognized them as the legitimate government. In 1999, the United Nations imposed sanctions to force the Taliban to turn over bin Laden, who was wanted in connection with the 1998 bombings of U.S. embassies in the Kenyan capital Nairobi and Dar-es-Salaam in Tanzania.

The Northern Alliance

Throughout the Taliban's rule, fighting continued between the Taliban and the Northern Alliance. The Alliance was made up of ethnic Tajik-dominated groups who had united to fight the Taliban.
Two days before al Qaeda launched its Sept. 11 attacks in the U.S., a leading member of the Northern Alliance, Ahmad Shah Massoud, was killed by suicide bombers posing as journalists. Al Qaeda members were believed to have carried out the assassination to curry favor with the Taliban.
The United States launched bombing raids on Afghanistan in October 2001 after the Taliban refused to hand over bin Laden. With U.S. help, the Northern Alliance took the northern city of Mazar-e-Sharif, then Kabul. The rest of the country swiftly followed.

2001 and Beyond

At the end of 2001, members of the opposition and international organizations gathered in Germany and drew up the Bonn Agreement, which provided a political roadmap for Afghanistan and a timetable for reconstruction. Hamid Karzai, an ethnic Pashtun born to the Popalzai clan – a sub-group of the royal Durrani tribe – was chosen to head an Interim Authority. He was later installed as president and won an outright majority in the first presidential election in 2004. Parliamentary elections were held the following year.
Presidential elections in 2009 – a key milestone for peace – were plagued by violence, widespread fraud and low turnout. Karzai won, after his main challenger Abdullah Abdullah pulled out saying a planned runoff vote was not going to be free and fair. Parliamentary elections in 2010 were calmer.
Presidential elections were held in April 2014, the same year all foreign combat troops are due to leave the country. The Taliban stepped up attacks ahead of the polls and threatened to disrupt the elections. But, on the day, there were fewer attacks than feared, and less fraud than in 2009.
A run-off vote between two candidates – Abdullah Abdullah and Ashraf Ghani – will be held in June. Under the constitution, Karzai was not allowed to stand in 2014. The government's authority remains fragile and violence has soared.
Taliban numbers swelled from 7,000 in 2006 to roughly 25,000 in 2009, according to a 2009 U.S. intelligence assessment. More recent estimates vary from between 20,000 and 35,000.
U.S. President Barack Obama decided to send additional troops to Afghanistan in 2009, boosting the total number of foreign troops to about 150,000. Most of the new U.S. troops headed south to the heart of the Taliban insurgency, where British, Canadian and Dutch soldiers did not have enough strength to keep hold of ground they captured.
NATO leaders began transferring responsibility for security to Afghans in 2011. The Afghan army took command of all military and security operations in June 2013. Foreign troops work with the Afghan National Army, which was about 183,000 strong in June 2013. The Afghan national police force numbered about 150,000. More than 13,000 Afghan soldiers and police officers have been killed in the past 13 years, since early 2011, the U.S. government has been seeking to hold peace talks with the Taliban, but it is unclear whether the militants are cohesive enough to agree on a joint diplomatic approach to the talks.
In May 2011, bin Laden was killed by U.S. Special Forces in northwestern Pakistan. By then, al Qaeda's influence on the Taliban had greatly diminished. NATO plans to keep a small military training and support mission in Afghanistan after the end of 2014, which the Taliban says is an encroachment on the country's independence. Western officials say that the exit of most foreign troops will remove one of the Taliban’s main recruiting tools.

Going Home

Millions of Afghans fled to neighboring countries during the years of conflict, and the Taliban's fall triggered one of the largest and swiftest refugee repatriations in the world.
Since 2002, Afghans have been streaming home, mostly from Iran and Pakistan. More than 5.7 million Afghans have returned to their country, according to the U.N. refugee agency (UNHCR). Another 2.5 million refugees and many undocumented Afghans were still in Pakistan and Iran in 2013, and further afield.
Pakistan and Iran have said they want the remaining Afghans on their soil to go home.
The number of people displaced inside Afghanistan is about 620,000, according to UNHCR. However, this is a conservative estimate because it is impossible to access and collect information in many areas.

Factors Responsible

The following factors have strongly affected Afghanistan’s political stability.
Political scientists believe that higher population size and concentration raises the risk of civil conflict. It could also lead to higher probability of revolutions to overthrow governing elites in non-democratic countries. This claim, supported by political scientists, does not refer to the number of people that eventually join an insurgency, but only the number of people that start one. They constitute enough rebels to pose a serious threat.
In Afghanistan the rural population is an important determinant of political stability.
Now and in the past, the political stability in Afghanistan has been threatened mainly by rural residents. Currently almost all insurgent groups such as the Taliban are based in rural areas. From those safe heavens they recruit insurgents and manage all of their destructive activities against the government.
The reasons are very obvious: rural areas are safe havens where insurgents could easily and freely plan their destructive activities. Moreover, the threat of rural populations to political stability of Afghanistan results from the interconnection of the following well-known facts:

Geography

Insurgency is closely related to the geography of the country. The presence of rough terrain, poorly served by roads and at a distance from the centers of state power, favors insurgents. This is fostered by the availability of cross-border sanctuaries inhabited by people that can be easily manipulated by local insurgents. In this scenario it is not uncommon that these local populations get trapped between their responsibilities as citizens of the country and their cultural loyalty to the local insurgent groups. Moreover, the government does not have a permanent control over these areas, which nurtures a decent atmosphere for insurgent groups.

Poverty

People feel that their government has abandoned them and failed to provide financial means to elevate their living standards. This problem is enhanced by the fact that the country has a large percentage of young men who cannot find enough employment opportunities. Their contribution to economic development and their participation in the political process is highly underexploited. Afghan young men tend to participate in activities that are either economically unproductive, such as joining gangs and drug cartels or politically destructive, such as organizing resistance groups under leadership of insurgents.

Extremism

It is a well-known fact that religious extremism has become the core of much of Afghanistan’s violence. Extremists justify their version of Islam to force people to accept their Islamic interpretation. This problem is further exacerbated by the fact that almost all of the rural residents are uneducated. Recently, there has been a dramatic increase in insurgent attacks in the country. Security handovers from NATO to Afghan forces, and the American pullout have motivated the Taliban to increase their destructive activities. The threat might strongly resurface yet again.
Based on these three reasons, the rural population has a strong impact on the political stability of Afghanistan.

Reconstruction Hurdles

Billions of aid dollars have poured into Afghanistan to help rebuild the shattered infrastructure and economy. Afghanistan depends on aid for most of its spending. International donors provided $35 billion in aid to Afghanistan between 2001 and 2010. And, in 2012, major donors pledged another $16 billion in development aid through 2015, in an attempt to prevent it from deteriorating further when foreign troops leave in 2014, but demanded reforms to fight widespread corruption. The aid was tied to a new monitoring process to help prevent money from being diverted by corrupt officials or mismanaged. While strides have been made in improving access to education and health care, less than a third of the population of 33 million is literate and the average person earns only about a $1,000 a year, according to the U.N. Development Programme.

Corruption

Reconstruction efforts have been dogged by allegations of corruption and waste on the part of the government, aid agencies and contractors. Public sector corruption is rife and Afghanistan, along with Somalia and North Korea, are considered to be the most corrupt countries in the world in Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index. Government officials and international aid workers have been accused of stealing money or taking bribes. Some companies that won contracts to rebuild the country have been accused of delivering shoddy roads, hospitals and schools or even nothing at all.
Many also complain that parliament, which is supposed to voice their grievances and keep the government in check, is made up mainly of ex-warlords and powerbrokers who use their position to serve their own interests.

Humanitarian Crisis

Civilians have borne the brunt of years of conflict and underdevelopment. Thousands are killed every year and millions have been displaced. An estimated 36 percent of the population lives below the national poverty line, and nearly 60 percent is chronically malnourished. The Taliban insurgency has forced many schools and health clinics to close. Natural disasters also affect tens of thousands of people every year, including earthquakes, frequent floods and drought. Aid agencies rely on air services to reach people in remote or insecure areas. More than 160 organizations use the U.N. Humanitarian Air Service, which has two airplanes and a helicopter, to transport aid workers and supplies. Violence is not the only threat to life. Children die of easily preventable diseases, and malnutrition. Afghanistan is one of three "polio endemic" countries with most cases in the turbulent south, according to the Global Polio Eradication Initiative.
Tuberculosis is another major public health challenge. Experts say women in particular suffer high rates because they tend to spend most of their time indoors and have less access to medical care than men do.

Drugs

Afghanistan produces 74 percent of the world's opium, the United Nations says. The Taliban, which banned cultivation during their rule, are now exploiting the trade to fund their insurgency. The majority of poppy fields are in the country's south and southwest where the Taliban are most active. One of the main tools in combating the narcotics trade involves fostering alternative livelihoods. The idea is to wean farmers away from poppy cultivation by offering them fertilizers and seeds for legal crops.


Print Friendly and PDF

Monday, 28 November 2016

LEVELS OF CONFLICT L#2

LEVELS OF CONFLICT [1]

Conflict often develops and escalates in a predictable pattern. It begins as a problem that needs to be solved Level 1. Problems are issues or challenges that can be described and for which solutions can potentially be found.
If the problem is not solved, conflict can escalate to level 2, a disagreement. The disagreement is often about how to solve the problem and is a normal, expected part of solving problems. The key is to find ways to resolve disagreement or to convince all parties to come to a shared point of view.
If the conflict continues to be unresolved, a level 3 conflict can emerge, a contest. A contest is one in which there are winners and losers and no one wants to be a loser. Sides begin to form and clarity about the problem to be solved begins to diminish. It quickly becomes more important to win than to solve the problem.
If the conflict continues to escalate to level 4, individuals and groups begin to act in more aggressive, instinctual ways and the situation can quickly deteriorate. In a fight/flight situation, those who are conflict avoidant leave and those who remain are typically more committed than ever to winning. Principles and dogma are often evoked as justification for various points of view. This level is characterized by strategizing how to win the fight and garnering the resources necessary to do so.
Level 5 describes a level of conflict in which hope for reconciliation is generally lost. Emotional responses overwhelm thinking and problem solving approaches. Combatants are focused not just on winning, but even on punishing or getting rid of their opponents.
Level 0 describes a situation in which the conflict is not openly acknowledged or recognized. It may have been present for a long period of time and remained essentially underground—unacknowledged and not discussed. This does not mean the conflict has gone away.
As part of its life an organization needs to be engaged in a developmental process of building trust, developing communication and negotiating skills, and establishing processes to manage concerns and new ideas. This gives people the ability to keep conflict at the lower levels. As conflict moves to higher levels people tend to resist skill development, elaborate problem solving methods, the introduction of new ground rules, etc. So, these things are best done when the parties are not in conflict.

1.      LEVEL ONE----PROBLEM TO SOLVE

OBJECTIVE
Fix the problem
SYMPTOMS
Tone/behaviors: optimistic, collaborative, problem not person focus, rational; language is clear, specific, real differences over goals, values, needs, plans, information; people understand each other and disagree.
STRATEGY
Facilitate decision making by collaborative problem solving, or if not possible, by negotiation, or if not possible, by formal authority action (by voting or leader decision.)
METHODS
Establish meeting norms, use a facilitator and a disciplined process, brainstorm and prioritize, use communication skills, etc.
2.      LEVEL TWO----DISAGREEMENT
OBJECTIVES
Self-protection, not getting hurt; solve the problem
SYMPTOMS
Cautious, not hostile; general language to protect people and self, e.g., “there is no trust”, “we need more openness” withhold information that might serve the other side or damage your side.
STRATEGY
Reduce tension and facilitate the parties to work together --the need here is to keep parties close enough to work though their differences and not engage in withdrawal or begin to get aggressive.  Encourage parties to “hang in”, attend and prepare for meetings; coach parties to act, to be confident, help people fully express their concerns and to listen to the concerns of others; provide ways to build relationships, ways for parties to know each other, to speak with each other about common interests and needs.
METHODS
Role reversal, expectations clarification, use facilitator, etc.
Establish ground rules -- get agreement about how we will work on the issue, e.g., no threats, identify sources of information, direct sharing of differences, no personal attacks, no withdrawing; norms for meetings, etc.
Make decisions -- collaborative problem solving --- negotiation --- formal authority

3.      LEVEL THREE----CONTEST

OBJECTIVES
Win, not yet at level of wanting to hurt the opponent
SYMPTOMS
Win/lose dynamics, threatening, difficult, resistance to peace overtures, waiting for others to show weakness, personal attacks, emotional appeals, limited social contact; making a case, expecting magic or rapid change, expecting others to read your mind, extreme, only two sides, lose the shade/gray.
STRATEGY
The overall need is to reduce fear and distorted thinking; to provide a sense of order.
Reduce tension and facilitate the parties to work together --the need here is to keep parties close enough to work though their differences and not engage in withdrawal or begin to get aggressive.  Encourage parties to “hang in”, attend and prepare for meetings; coach parties to act, to be confident, help people fully express their concerns and to listen to the concerns of others; provide ways to build relationships, ways for parties to know each other, to speak with each other about common interests and needs.
Structure the process -- work out a clear process; dates of meetings, time lines, etc. Revise it as needed; but work at maintaining a sense of order and direction. There is a high need for a process that is seen as fair, open, and legal.
Use an external consultant 
Contact between  to the conflict needs to be carefully managed -- opportunities for people to express feelings and clarify their interests need to be provided for each side; this usually needs to first be done apart from the other side; when they are ready to work together, then have a carefully facilitated meeting.
DECISION MAKING
The same sequence as at other levels; however, the more persuasion, compelling and voting the more likely that people will leave the organization.

4.      LEVEL FOUR----FIGHT/FLIGHT

Objectives
Hurt/get rid of the others
SYMPTOMS
Factions inflexible, clear lines, strong leaders emerge; language becomes ideological - about principles, detached, causing each to lose sense of the pain they cause; will not speak with each other, self-righteous.
STRATEGY
More tension will require more structure. Use an external consultant/mediator
Follow the book -- legal issues may be involved, trust is very low; follow the legal standards.
Communicate through third -- seek an agreement for third to serve as “go-betweens” to carry messages, look for possible areas of agreement, most likely to be useful when the issue is clear.
Be tougher about the ground rules.

5.      LEVEL FIVE----INTRACTABLE SITUATION

Objective: destroy the others
SYMPTOMS
Attempts to do serious damage to the other’s reputation, position, wellbeing; attempts may continue after the have been separated
STRATEGY
The conflict is no longer manageable.
Outside authority will need to make difficult decisions.
The need to be separated.




[1] Based on Spead Leas, Moving Your Church Through Conflict

Print Friendly and PDF

Sunday, 27 November 2016

THE AFGHANISTAN LOYA JIRGA

THE AFGHANISTAN LOYA JIRGA

The Loya Jirga is the highest manifestation of the will of the people of Afghanistan. 

Composition:

·         Members of the National Assembly; 
·         Presidents of the provincial as well as district assemblies.
·         Ministers
·         Chief Justice and members of the Supreme Court
·         The Attorney General shall participate in the Loya Jirga sessions without voting rights.

The Loya Jirga shall convene in the following situations:

·         To decide on issues related to independence, national sovereignty, territorial integrity as well as supreme national interests; 
·         Amend provisions of this Constitution; 
·         Impeach the President in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution.

Chairperson:

In its first session, the Loya Jirga shall elect, from amongst its members, a Chairperson, a Deputy-Chair, and a Secretary and an Assistant Secretary.

Quorum and Voting:

The quorum of the Loya Jirga shall be complete for voting with the presence of the majority of members.  The decision of the Loya Jirga, except in situations explicitly stated in this Constitution, shall be adopted by a majority of members present.

Session:


Sessions of the Loya Jirga shall be open unless one fourth of its membership demand secrecy, and the Loya Jirga accept this demand.  
Print Friendly and PDF

THE AFGHANISTAN NATIONAL ASSEMBLY

THE AFGHANISTAN (MILLI SHURA ملی شورا) NATIONAL ASSEMBLY

The National Assembly of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, as the highest legislative organ, manifest the will of its people as well as represent the entire nation. Every member of the Assembly, when voting, shall judge according to the general interests as well as the supreme benefits of the people of Afghanistan.

Composition:

The National Assembly consists of two houses:
·                     House of People (Wolesi Jirga ولسي جرګه)
·                     House of Elders (Meshrano Jirga مشرانوجرګه)
No individual shall be a member of both houses at the same time.

Strength:

The House of People consist of 249 delegates.
The House of Elders has 102 members

Tenure:

The House of People elected for five years, while The House of Elders adopts a different method for different member’s retirement.

Elections:

Members of the House of People shall be elected by the people through free, general, secret and direct balloting.  The elections for members of the House of People shall be held 30-60 days prior to the expiration of the term of the House of People.
The number of the members of the House of People shall be proportionate to the population of each constituency, not exceeding the maximum of two hundred fifty individuals on average, at least two females shall be the elected members of the House of People from each province. 
Members of the House of Elders shall be elected and appointed as follows:
·         From amongst each provincial council members, one individual shall be elected by the respective council for a four year term; 
·         From amongst district councils of each province, one individual, elected by the respective councils, for a three year term; 
·         The remaining one third of the members shall be appointed by the President, for a five year term, from amongst experts and experienced personalities, including two members from amongst the impaired and handicapped, as well as two from nomads.
The President shall appoint fifty percent of these individuals from amongst women.  The individual selected as a member of the House of Elders shall lose membership to the related Council.
Qualifications:
In addition to the completion of the conditions of the election, shall have the following qualifications:
·         Shall be a citizen of Afghanistan or shall have obtained citizenship of the state of Afghanistan at least ten years prior to candidacy date or appointment; 
·         Shall not have been convicted of crimes against humanity, as well as a crime or deprivation from civil rights by a court; 
·         Shall have completed twenty-five years of age on candidacy day for the House of People, and thirty-five years on candidacy day or appointment for the House of Elders.

Presiding Officer:

Each of the two houses of the National Assembly, at the commencement of their work period, shall elect one member as president for the term of the legislature, and two members as first and second deputies and two members as secretary and assistant secretary for a period of one year. 

Session:

The National Assembly shall hold two regular sessions annually.  The term of both regular sessions shall be nine months every year, and when needed, the Assembly shall extend its term.  Extraordinary sessions of the Assembly during recess shall be convened by Presidential order. 
Both Houses of the National Assembly shall convene their sessions concurrently, but separately.  Sessions of the two Houses shall be held jointly under the following circumstances:
·         When the legislative term or annual sessions are inaugurated by the President; 
·         When deemed necessary by the President.
The President of the House of People shall preside over the joint sessions of the National Assembly. 
The sessions of the National Assembly shall be open unless the President of the Assembly or at least ten members of the National Assembly request their secrecy and the Assembly grants their request. 

Quorum:

The quorum for voting of each House of the National Assembly shall be complete with the majority presence of members and decisions shall be taken with the majority of votes of members present, unless this Constitution states otherwise. 

Powers and Functions of the Afghanistan National Assembly:

Each of the two houses of the National Assembly shall form commissions to study issues under discussion in accordance with the Regulations of Internal Duties.
The House of People shall have the authority to establish a special commission, on the proposal of one third of its members, to review as well as investigate the actions of the Government.  The composition and method of operation of the aforementioned commission shall be determined by the Regulations on Internal Duties.

The National Assembly shall have the following duties:

  • ·         Formulate new laws
  • ·         Ratification, modification or abrogation of laws
  • ·         Approval of social, cultural, economic as well as technological development programs; 
  • ·         Approval of the state budget as well as permission to obtain or grant loans; 
  • ·         Creation, modification and or abrogation of administrative units; 
  • ·         Ratification of international treaties and agreements, or abrogation of membership of Afghanistan in them;
  • ·         Any commission of both houses of the parliament can question any Minister about special issues.  The individual questioned shall provide an oral or written response.
  • ·         Law shall be what both houses of the National Assembly approve and the President endorses, unless this Constitution states otherwise.  In case the President rejects what the National Assembly has approved, the President shall send it back, within fifteen days from the date it was presented, to the House of People mentioning the reasons for rejection, and, with expiration of the period or if the House of People re-approves it with two thirds of all the votes, the draft shall be considered endorsed and enforceable. 
  • ·         Proposals for drafting laws shall be first submitted to the House of People by the government.  The House of People shall consider the draft laws, including budgetary and financial affairs as well as the proposal for obtaining or granting loans, and, after debate, either approve or reject as a whole.  The House of People shall not delay more than one month the draft proposal.  The House of People, after approving the proposed draft, shall send it to the House of the Elders.  The House of Elders shall decide on it within fifteen days.
  • ·         The state budget and development program of the government shall be submitted, through the House of Elders to the House of People along with its advisory views.  The decision of the House of People shall be implemented without presentation to the House of Elders, after endorsement by the President.  If for some reasons the budget is not approved before the beginning of the new fiscal year, the budget of the year before shall be applied pending the passage of the new budget.  The House of People shall not delay approval of the budget for more than one month after receiving it and give permission to obtain or grant loans not included in the budget, for more than fifteen days. If the House of People during this period does not decide on obtaining or granting loans, the proposal shall be considered approved.  If, during the sessions of the National Assembly, the annual budget, or development program, or issues related to national security, territorial integrity and independence of the country is under discussion, the sessions of the Assembly shall not end pending decision of the matter

The House of People shall have the following special authorities:

  • ·         Decide about explanation session from each Minister
  • ·         Decide on the development programs as well as the state budget; 
  • ·         Approve or reject appointments according to provisions of this Constitution. 
  • ·         The House of People, on the proposal of twenty percent of all its members, shall make inquiries from each Minister.  If the explanations given are not satisfactory, the House of People shall consider the issue of a no- confidence vote.  The no- confidence vote on a Minister shall be explicit, direct, as well as based on convincing reasons. The vote shall be approved by the majority of all members of the House of People.

In Situation of Deadlock between the two Houses:


If one House rejects decisions of the other, a joint commission comprised of an equal number of members from each House shall be formed to solve the difference.  The decision of the commission, after endorsement by the President, shall be enforced. If the joint commission does not solve the difference, the decision shall be considered rejected.  In such situation, the House of People shall pass it with two-thirds majority in its next session.  This decision, without submission to the House of Elders, shall be promulgated once endorsement by the President. 
Print Friendly and PDF